»We die alone, killing another person takes two. Man’s ability to kill his own kind possibly constitutes human history more than his fundamental destiny to die.«
On the benefits and disadvantages of memory for our lives
Koselleck’s work on the »cult of the dead« for the first time in one volume
With numerous unpublished texts and autobiographical notes
Commemorating those »violently killed« is a core part of political culture. With his groundbreaking work on the »cult of the dead«, Reinhart Koselleck has opened up a new field of research: European memorial landscapes in all their historical, aesthetic and political complexity. Whether they are sacrifices for the fatherland or victims of wars and tyranny, whether they were killed in civil wars and revolutions or by criminal acts of the state, political or...
Commemorating those »violently killed« is a core part of political culture. With his groundbreaking work on the »cult of the dead«, Reinhart Koselleck has opened up a new field of research: European memorial landscapes in all their historical, aesthetic and political complexity. Whether they are sacrifices for the fatherland or victims of wars and tyranny, whether they were killed in civil wars and revolutions or by criminal acts of the state, political or religious terror – they all are »killed dead«. Without remembering them, according to the humanist Koselleck, it is not possible to go on living.
This volume gathers Koselleck’s essays on the political cult of the dead, journalistic contributions to the debates on the »Neue Wache« and the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, theoretical reflections on the concept of memory and unpublished autobiographical notes on his experiences of World War II and as a POW in Russian captivity. Distancing themselves from the popular »culture of remembrance«, these texts emphasise the inalienability of the difference between individual experience and collective constructions of memory. History should not create such collective identities, but critically analyse them. This, according to Koselleck, is the task of historical scholarship.
For more than three decades, Hans Blumenberg and Reinhart Koselleck maintained a correspondence that was characterized by mutual affection but also by distance. It shows two academic protagonists discuss the founding of universities and interdisciplinarity in times of university reform – and two sensitive scholars trying to communicate central aspects of their research: conceptual...
Over the course of three decades, from 1953 to 1983, jurist Carl Schmitt (1888-1985) and historian Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006) corresponded with one another. The exchange between the former »Crown Jurist of the Third Reich« and the future »most important German historian of the 20th centurry« (DIE ZEIT) not only deals with the main works of the two protagonists but also with...
Spanish world rights (Trotta), Brazilian Portuguese rights (Contraponto), Italy (Il Mulino), Poland (Oficyna Naukowa), Turkey (Iletisim)
Previously published in the respective language / territory; rights available again: Romania (Editura ART)
English world rights (MIT Press), Spanish world rights (Prometeo), Chinese simplex rights (Commercial Press), Russia (NLO), Brazilian Portuguese rights (Contrapunto), Arabic world rights (Dar alKitab), France (Éditions de l'EHESS), Italy (CLUEB), Sweden (Daidalos), Turkey (Alfa)
Previously published in the respective language / territory; rights available again: Korea (Munhakdongne), Poland (Poznanskie), Hungary (Atlantisz), Greece (Exandas), Ukraine (Spirit and Letter)